Motor Finance Ruling Exposes Deeper Crisis in Financial Transparency
Read Time 3 mins | Written by: Andy Smith
The UK Supreme Court’s imminent decision in the motor finance commission cases, Johnson, Wrench, and Hopcraft, represents far more than a sector-specific ruling. Expected in July 2025, this landmark judgment threatens to expose systemic failures in financial transparency that extend well beyond car dealerships, highlighting critical weaknesses in consumer protection and financial literacy across Britain. This won't be news for many working in financial services and echoes research findings Amplifi Global have recently shared with regulators in both the UK and abroad.
The Transparency Imperative
The Court of Appeal’s October 2024 ruling established that motor dealers must provide clear, comprehensive disclosure of commission arrangements to customers, finding that vague terms buried in small print constitute inadequate disclosure. This decision directly reinforces the FCA’s longstanding “fair, clear and not misleading” Handbook requirements which mandate that financial communications must be “clearly identifiable,” “accurate,” and “balanced”. Amplifi Global's research highlights the very real difficulties that consumers have with mainstream credit card agreements, even where those agreements are written in plain English. Compared to motor finance agreements credit card agreements might be regarded as "simpler", however the application of Amplifi Global's unique suite of multi-layered understanding tools show that the reality is that consumers struggle with complex jargon, unfamiliar concepts and a structure that requires considerable cognitive engagement to absorb all the information in a useful and holistic manner.
The motor finance cases illuminate this troubling pattern where essential financial information is systematically obscured from consumers. The Court of Appeal criticised arrangements where commission details were “buried” in terms and conditions, with customers often unaware that dealers received payments that could influence their advice. This mirrors broader industry practices where mandatory fees and conflicts of interest remain hidden until consumers are committed to transactions. These are worrying patterns and whilst credit card agreements would not usually contain commission arrangements they are potentially complex and confusing.
Regulatory Response and Wider Implications
The FCA’s intervention in the Supreme Court proceedings signals recognition that this case could reshape transparency requirements across financial services. The regulator has already strengthened its enforcement of promotional standards, with nearly 20,000 financial promotions withdrawn or amended in 2024—double the previous year’s figure. This intensified scrutiny reflects growing concern about systemic non-compliance with transparency rules. The recent consultation around changes to Consumer Credit Act legislation will provide an opportunity to look at other disclosures including the agreement itself, work which Amplifi Global research highlights as both necessary and overdue.
The potential multi-billion pound redress scheme under consideration demonstrates the scale of consumer detriment from inadequate disclosure practices. Such widespread failings suggest that current regulatory frameworks, despite comprehensive rules on treating customers fairly, have failed to ensure meaningful transparency in practice.
The Financial Literacy Crisis
The motor finance controversy occurs against a backdrop of alarming financial illiteracy in the UK. Research reveals that the majority of British adults fall below acceptable financial literacy benchmarks.
Particularly concerning is the disconnect between perceived and actual understanding: The Amplifi Global research shows whilst most adults consider themselves financially literate, 62% of UK population (Forbes) cannot fully explain how a credit card works. This knowledge gap leaves consumers vulnerable to complex commission arrangements and opaque financial products, exactly the scenarios highlighted in the motor finance cases. The motor finance rightly highlights specific problems, however it might be regarded as the tip of the mid-understanding iceberg.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s decision will likely trigger enhanced transparency requirements across financial services, potentially affecting insurance, mortgages, and investment products where commission arrangements exist. However, addressing transparency alone is insufficient. The motor finance scandal exposes the urgent need for improved financial education and the need for firms to introduce fundamental changes to how information is presented to consumers and how they test true understanding. Relying on plain English and basic recall is unlikely to meet the requirements of Consumer Duty and good consumer outcomes.
The ruling’s broader significance lies not in its immediate impact on car finance, but in its potential to catalyse fundamental reform of how financial services communicate with consumers, reform that Britain’s financially illiterate population desperately needs.
The Transparency Imperative
The Court of Appeal’s October 2024 ruling established that motor dealers must provide clear, comprehensive disclosure of commission arrangements to customers, finding that vague terms buried in small print constitute inadequate disclosure. This decision directly reinforces the FCA’s longstanding “fair, clear and not misleading” Handbook requirements which mandate that financial communications must be “clearly identifiable,” “accurate,” and “balanced”. Amplifi Global's research highlights the very real difficulties that consumers have with mainstream credit card agreements, even where those agreements are written in plain English. Compared to motor finance agreements credit card agreements might be regarded as "simpler", however the application of Amplifi Global's unique suite of multi-layered understanding tools show that the reality is that consumers struggle with complex jargon, unfamiliar concepts and a structure that requires considerable cognitive engagement to absorb all the information in a useful and holistic manner.
The motor finance cases illuminate this troubling pattern where essential financial information is systematically obscured from consumers. The Court of Appeal criticised arrangements where commission details were “buried” in terms and conditions, with customers often unaware that dealers received payments that could influence their advice. This mirrors broader industry practices where mandatory fees and conflicts of interest remain hidden until consumers are committed to transactions. These are worrying patterns and whilst credit card agreements would not usually contain commission arrangements they are potentially complex and confusing.
Regulatory Response and Wider Implications
The FCA’s intervention in the Supreme Court proceedings signals recognition that this case could reshape transparency requirements across financial services. The regulator has already strengthened its enforcement of promotional standards, with nearly 20,000 financial promotions withdrawn or amended in 2024—double the previous year’s figure. This intensified scrutiny reflects growing concern about systemic non-compliance with transparency rules. The recent consultation around changes to Consumer Credit Act legislation will provide an opportunity to look at other disclosures including the agreement itself, work which Amplifi Global research highlights as both necessary and overdue.
The potential multi-billion pound redress scheme under consideration demonstrates the scale of consumer detriment from inadequate disclosure practices. Such widespread failings suggest that current regulatory frameworks, despite comprehensive rules on treating customers fairly, have failed to ensure meaningful transparency in practice.
The Financial Literacy Crisis
The motor finance controversy occurs against a backdrop of alarming financial illiteracy in the UK. Research reveals that the majority of British adults fall below acceptable financial literacy benchmarks.
Particularly concerning is the disconnect between perceived and actual understanding: The Amplifi Global research shows whilst most adults consider themselves financially literate, 62% of UK population (Forbes) cannot fully explain how a credit card works. This knowledge gap leaves consumers vulnerable to complex commission arrangements and opaque financial products, exactly the scenarios highlighted in the motor finance cases. The motor finance rightly highlights specific problems, however it might be regarded as the tip of the mid-understanding iceberg.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s decision will likely trigger enhanced transparency requirements across financial services, potentially affecting insurance, mortgages, and investment products where commission arrangements exist. However, addressing transparency alone is insufficient. The motor finance scandal exposes the urgent need for improved financial education and the need for firms to introduce fundamental changes to how information is presented to consumers and how they test true understanding. Relying on plain English and basic recall is unlikely to meet the requirements of Consumer Duty and good consumer outcomes.
The ruling’s broader significance lies not in its immediate impact on car finance, but in its potential to catalyse fundamental reform of how financial services communicate with consumers, reform that Britain’s financially illiterate population desperately needs.
Andy Smith - General Counsel & Regulatory Affairs Advisor
Still have a question? Let's talk.
Whether you’re ready to explore Amplifi or just want to understand how it fits into your workflow, we’re here to help.